Screenshot 4:26 PM Calif. time
9h
·
Shared with Public
In 1902 land ownership in SA was:
Black people 7%
British lords 93%
Boers 0% (all their land was confiscated during the war)
Over several decades after 1913, Afrikaner Boers BOUGHT land (mostly dry land nobody else wanted) from the British lords. They were forbidden from buying in the fertile tribal areas by the Land Act. They found ways to farm, digging canals by hand, and paid off the bonds over 20 to 30 years.
34
Schalk Burger and 33 others
115 Comments
10 Shares
Like
Comment
Share
115 Comments
Winnie Smith
Thank you for sharing this!shows you and they keep saying the land was stolen from them what they want is freebies were they can sit on their buts and do nothing
- 4
Like
· Reply · 9h
Malohle Mampane
Winnie Smith Go on and share the hell out of it. I’m sure you don’t even care whether it’s true or not.
I’m still yet to hear anyone dispute what is written in this book, which is a complete opposite of what is posted here.
-
-
Like
· Reply · 4h
Winnie Smith
Malohle Mampane
Like
· Reply · 4h
Malohle Mampane
Winnie Smith did you get a stroke before you could finish your reply to my comment?
I see you only tagged my name.
Like
· Reply · 4h
Schalk Burger
Malohle Mampane I don’t understand your issue. The blacks have ample land and the Afrikaners didn’t steal your land. Even if the Afrikaners have to return land, the Gauteng area would be returned to the Tswana, not the Zulu, Xhosa or any other tribe. As a general rule, i think the Tswanas are generally more peaceful than the rest, so the Boers probably wouldn’t mind them.
Like
· Reply · 3h
Malohle Mampane
Schalk Burger what are you responding to with this comment?
Like
· Reply · 3h
Schalk Burger
Malohle Mampane i just don’t see what you are doing in this thread. It not your war, wasn’t your war, and there was no sin against you? Yet you are trying to force your narrative in here.
Like
· Reply · 3h
Malohle Mampane
Schalk Burger Do you understand the thing called history? Don’t you know that some people have passion for history of all nations? That fact can’t be difficult to fathom.
Like
· Reply · 2h
-
-
Active
Write a reply…
Ferris Jenvey
I like this post!
- 1
Like
· Reply · 9h
Malohle Mampane
Ferris Jenvey fake news. There was actually a doctoral thesis I once read about how the Afrikaners received reparations after the war. Which was contrary to the common practice where the vanquished ( like Germany at the treaty of Versailles) were made to pay way reparations to the victor.
-
-
Like
· Reply · 4h
Schalk Burger
Malohle Mampane you’re s real hater!!!! The Germans initiated the war by colonizing the countries around them.
In the case of the Afrikaners, they were the Victims of British colonization.
The British came with very unethical solution to murder and conquer the Afrikaners. For instance murdering their woman and children, as well as burning down their farms.
The Afrikaners also had to privately fund their own war-effort and many must have been going bankrupt especially after the British burned their crops and slaughtered their cattle.
What price is high enough to pay for your dead family??
Like
· Reply · 2h
Malohle Mampane
Schalk Burger what does this have to do with the article I posted? Where in the article do you see my personal opinion that convinced you I’m a hater?
Like
· Reply · 2h
-
-
Active
Write a reply…
Glenda Kruger
Thank you for the information.
Like
· Reply · 9h
Cobus Smith
They don’t understand it. They don’t believe in facts. They believe themselves.
- 2
Like
· Reply · 9h · Edited
Malohle Mampane
Cobus Smith Maybe publish a book about it. We’ll see if it’s enough to counter what is written in this one.
-
-
Like
· Reply · 4h
-
-
Active
Write a reply…
Johny Basterd
Thank you for this information
- 1
Like
· Reply · 8h
Hide 11 Replies
Malohle Mampane
Johny Basterd You guys are so funny. Am I right in thinking there’ll probably be no need to research this further? Eureka, a guy on Facebook typed up stuff from his head with no effort to furnish references and it’s the gospel truth you have been looking for all along?
-
-
Like
· Reply · 4h
Malohle Mampane
-
Like
-
-
Play GIF
Like
· Reply · 4h
Johny Basterd
Malohle Mampane I knew about the British before hand and I knew they had by far most of the land…. And what do you know..? Fake propaganda by the Anc??
Like
· Reply · 4h
Malohle Mampane
Johny Basterd Shame man I’m sure that’s the furthest your brain can propel you (the hurling of insults). That you refer to this drivel as ‘information’ speaks volumes about your brain capacity. Here is the Treaty of Vereeniging. Have a look. Not sure if you’ll comprehend it though.
-
-
-
Like
· Reply · 4h
Johny Basterd
Malohle Mampane so??? I know about the payment, all belonged to the British… Nothing about land there……
Like
· Reply · 3h
Malohle Mampane
Johny Basterd You mean you can’t actually read? Wow I said it tongue in cheek when I said you might not be able to comprehend the document. I didn’t think you’ll prove me right. Let me mark it for you.
-
-
-
Like
· Reply · 2h
Johny Basterd
Malohle Mampane property rights of boers… Now the question is what property what %… Doesnt say that.
Like
· Reply · 2h
Malohle Mampane
Johny Basterd so you’ll rather believe what you referred to as ‘information’? The one that say they got Zero land? Is it really that bad with your thinking capabilities?
Like
· Reply · 2h
Malohle Mampane
-
-
-
Play GIF
Like
· Reply · 2h
Johny Basterd
Malohle Mampane you all about my thinking ability…… Offcause the boers had land but they paid for it from the British… Nothing was just given for mahala…. That idea that the boers came and just took land is one big lie
-
-
-
Play GIF
Like
· Reply · 2h
Malohle Mampane
Johny Basterd They bought it from the British that gave them £3 000 000 in aid for reconstruction? Do you really believe what you just said? Can I see your references?
Like
· Reply · 2h
-
-
Active
Write a reply…
Schalk Burger
Waar kry jy daardie info? Also? Are you talking about the Freestate, Transvaal or Capetown?
Like
· Reply · See Translation · 8h
Malohle Mampane
Schalk Burger It’s actually gibberish. Look up The Treaty of Vereeniging.
Like
· Reply · 4h
-
Active
Write a reply…
Themba Mdlalose
This post is obviously not true. Does the author want us to believe that Afrikaners owned no land in the Boer republics?????
- 2
Like
· Reply · 8h
Rian Geldenhuys
Themba Mdlalose not after the war. The British confiscated all land. Boers were prisoners of war.
-
- 2
Like
· Reply · 7h
Daniel Le-Khosi Koka
Rian Geldenhuys what happened after the Boers won the war. When they went to war they took blacks with them promised them land after the war with British what Happened?
Like
· Reply · 7h
Frederik Burgers
Daniel Le-Khosi Koka Boers lost… Lost every thing! That is Why some immigrated to Argentina, and one off the fundamental reasons for the Rebellion. Few realize the the GRA (GENOODSKAP vir die regte Afrikaner) was foundend in the same year as the ANC, why would that be? Same oppressor, maybe? And yet we CHOOSE to honor them in conversing in their language, strange.
Like
· Reply · 6h · Edited
Themba Mdlalose
Rian Geldenhuys After post war peace was signed Boers went back to their vast farms . Their only problem was livestock. It is Africans who had no land but livestock. They became sharecroppers on Boer farms. The 1913 land Act helped to dispossess Africans of their live stock. Blacks were told they were no longer welcome on white farms but they did not know where they were allowed to go. So they became wonderers with Boers following them on horseback not allowing them even to rest or bury their dead. They ended up offering their livestock almost for free to the Boers.Sol Plaatjie was an eye witness and wrote a book about it. He was the first secretary general of the ANC.
- 2
-
- 2
Like
· Reply · 6h · Edited
Rian Geldenhuys
Themba Mdlalose I read Sol Plaatjes book. But that happened in 1916. Not 1902
Like
· Reply · 6h
Rian Geldenhuys
The British really hated the idea of Boers and Natives farming together
Like
· Reply · 5h
Schalk Burger
Rian Geldenhuys why?
Like
· Reply · 2h
Schalk Burger
Themba Mdlalose Before the war the Boers also had to buy their land with bank loans. It make sense that they went bankrupt during the war, as thy couldn’t buy the installments and then British Lords picked up the land for cheap.
Regarding the share-cropping. It sounds terrible and I’ll definitely read up on it, but then again, the blacks did spy on the Boers on behalf of the British and as far as i know it was the British who promised the Blacks land, not the other way around.
Like
· Reply · 2h
- 2
-
Active
Write a reply…
Emmanuel Tong
100%✓
And I agree because of what I have as a local Investigation Activist .. Rian Geldenhuys I love you .. that’s why you and I we are chosen . Power most people don’t no about this
- 5
Like
· Reply · 8h · Edited
Malohle Mampane
Emmanuel Tong This is fake news.
Like
· Reply · 1h
Michael Bain
Explain how the native lands act of 1913 which limit Black African ownership to 7% and displaced people worked, if in 1912 it was already 7%?
- 1
Like
· Reply · 7h
Hide 26 Replies
Rian Geldenhuys
Michael Bain the act did not ‘decrease’ black ownership. That is a myth. Black ownership increased after the Act because of (b)
-
- 2
Like
· Reply · 7h · Edited
Rian Geldenhuys
It was aimed at stopping black chiefs from selling to White people. The gvt was worried they would end up with nothing
- 2
-
- 4
Like
· Reply · 7h
Michael Bain
https://www.gov.za/issues/land-reform
The 1913 Natives Land Act saw thousands of black families forcibly removed from their land by the apartheid government.Yes I know this is pre-apartheid – but if they are misreporting history they should be taken to task
- 4
-
- GOV.ZA
Land reform | South African Government
- GOV.ZA
-
- 3
Like
· Reply · 7h
Rian Geldenhuys
Michael Bain in the 23 years between 1913 and 1936 black land ownership increased to 13% thanks to the Land Act
- 3
-
- 1
Like
· Reply · 7h
Michael Bain
What about the claim of forced removals ?
- 1
-
- 2
Like
· Reply · 7h
Rian Geldenhuys
Michael Bain that is true. Squatters who settled on destroyed farms during the war were forcibly removed from Free State farms. It was quite sad. Sol Plaatjie wrote about it.
- 2
-
- 2
Like
· Reply · 7h
Michael Bain
Michael Bain the act did not ‘limit’ black ownership. That is a mythIt seems pretty well documented that land ownership was restricted by race
Like
· Reply · 7h
Rian Geldenhuys
Michael Bain land transactions between races were restricted. Black areas were reserved to stop White people from buying all the land.
I don’t like the act because it is racist. But it limited White expansion
Like
· Reply · 6h
Michael Bain
WRONG – quoting from the act
1.(1) From and after the commence of this Act, land outside the scheduled native areas shall, until Parliament, acting upon the report of the commission appointed under this Act, shall have made other provision, be subject to the following provisions, that is to say:-Except with the approval of the Governor General –
(a) A native shall not enter into any agreement/or transaction for the purchase, hire, or other acquisition from a person other than a native, of any such land or of any right thereto, interest therein, or servitude thereover: and
(b) A person other than a native shall not enter into any agreement or transaction for the purchase, hire or any other acquisition from a native of any such land or of any right thereto, interest therein, or servitude thereover.
—-
Behind paywall vaulted with 12ft.io
https://12ft.io/proxy…
12FT.IO
12ft |Like
· Reply · 6h
Rian Geldenhuys
Michael Bain what is ‘WRONG’?
Like
· Reply · 6h
Emmanuel Tong
I agree with Rian . And some information people don’t no .. force removal was made for the sake of traditional affairs bill operation
- 2
-
- 1
Like
· Reply · 6h
Michael Bain
A native shall not enter into any agreement/or transaction for the purchase, hire, or other acquisition from a person other than a native“the act did not ‘limit’ black ownership.”
These two statements are mutually exclusive
Like
· Reply · 6h
Rian Geldenhuys
(b) is what it was all about. Stop people ‘other than a Native’ from buying Native land. In practice black people bought more land.
1912 7%
1936 13%
They bought from gvt
- 1
-
- 1
Like
· Reply · 6h
Rian Geldenhuys
Michael Bain the act did not limit black ownership. It INCREASED black ownership from 7% to 13%.
Is what happened. I kid you not.
- 1
-
- 1
Like
· Reply · 6h
Michael Bain
It says there in black and white, without approval of the governer – may not purchase land from anyone other than a native.That ownership increased was incidental to the act limiting ownership rights based on race, it was still limited
Like
· Reply · 6h
Rian Geldenhuys
But it doesn’t make the whole thing any less racist. Before 1913 Boers and Natives farmed together
- 1
-
- 1
Like
· Reply · 6h
Rian Geldenhuys
Michael Bain ok. I will charge the word to decrease then.
- 1
-
- 1
Like
· Reply · 6h
Rian Geldenhuys
Until 1913 what happened in practice is that White ppl bought big pieces of land far from mines. Black people used that money to buy small stands near mines
- 1
-
- 1
Like
· Reply · 6h
Rian Geldenhuys
Michael Bain the commissioner was Lord Beaumont
- 1
-
- 1
Like
· Reply · 5h
Schalk Burger
Rian Geldenhuys it wasn’t sad, it was opportunistic.
Like
· Reply · 2h
Schalk Burger
Michael Bain I don’t know the fact as well as Rian Geldenhuys, but on the otherhand: why was the blacks in the ZAR? Because their economical and sexual culture built up pressure in the bantustans.
Also: South Africa was never one country and the Afrikaners were victims of colonialism, not perpetrators, so on what basis were they not allowed to limit black ownership of land in their one and only country?
Like
· Reply · 2h · Edited
Thamsanqa Manceda
Rian Geldenhuys these are lies
- 1
-
-
Like
· Reply · 2h
Thamsanqa Manceda
-
-
-
Like
· Reply · 2h
Schalk Burger
Thamsanqa Manceda I don’t understand your issue. South Africa was never a united a-racial country. The blacks had the main responsibility to educate the African children, not the whites, as the whites were struggling to educate their own children. The empoverishment of Africans were also happening to Afrikaners before the Angloboer war, with much the same dinamic as black empowerishment.
Like
· Reply · 1h
Schalk Burger
Thamsanqa Manceda and in any case, after the 40’s the Afrikaners spent millions on black education, but the result is still the same.
Like
· Reply · 1h
Thamsanqa Manceda
Schalk Burger
We dont care about it, your race benefited from that education, they needed blacks to learn a bit so that they give them whatever shitty position they thought was good enough for their survival.
So please stop acting like you guys are mad here. You guys know facts and know very well what we have went through. Did we deserve to be beaten for not carrying a fucking pass?
-
-
- 1
Like
· Reply · 1h
- 1
-
Active
Write a reply…
Francois Janse van Vuuren
Zanell Van Vuuren Peter Kreuger
Like
· Reply · 7h
Active
Gary Gevisser
Why is it that people ignore that in war the land and the minerals beneath are grabbed without payment and yet what then takes place such as payment using either government monies issued by the winners or the minerals previously stolen using the pointed barrel of a gun become gospel and spoken about incessantly?I’m not talking morals here, only common sense logic.
Let’s no forget that when all hell breaks loose what is previously bought or won in battle comes down to the next war-battle.
Do you think it is all poor schooling or stupidity or a combination of both?
Let me ask some of my other Facebook friends what they think and maybe this will go viral before the earth runs out out oxygen.
South African multibillionaire and former client, Solly Krok
Israel Air Force Pilot, Lt. Colonel Tomer Tene who is also Israel’s largest organic produce farmer who in order to stay competitive has to import workers from Thailand while government officials on both sides clean up.
Economist Dr. Rodney Smith Phd.
Judy Edelstein
Gabe Courts
- 1
Like
· Reply · 7h
Hide 14 Replies
Active
Gary Gevisser
Judy Edelstein, a better way of expressing it is, “I agree with you.”Only an insane or corrupt person would disagree with my observation which should have everyone recognizing how extraordinarily easily they have been fooled and to do the logical next step and question all those silent as well as those who talk up a storm of how good, how intelligent they are.
With the power of the light speed Internet we could end this mass psychosis in the next instant other than ugly, mean people have big egos and would rather die than let go of their ego.
Like
· Reply · 6h
Active
Gary Gevisser
-
- 1
Like
· Reply · 6h
Active
Gary Gevisser
Judy Edelstein if you are choosing your words so carefully, how come you didn’t say I wish I had the common sense to figure out these most important facts of life that have escaped all the philosophers, economists, industrialists, philanthropists, politicians etc.Ego right?
Like
· Reply · 6h
Active
Gary Gevisser
I would like to make note of the following.Judy Edelstein who I tagged alongside 8 other fb friends has removed all her comments starting with the first at 9:22 AM Calif time, “i have to agree w you”.
This had me responding immediately; “Judy Edelstein, a better way of expressing it is, ‘I agree with you” …
Like
· Reply · 3h · Edited
Active
Gary Gevisser
- 1
-
-
Like
· Reply · 3h
Active
Gary Gevisser
At 9:37 AM, Judy Edelstein responded, “Gary Gevisser, please don’t choose my words for me. They are chosen w much care to express what I wish to say, not what you wish me to say”.
Like
· Reply · 3h · Edited
Schalk Burger
Gary Gevisser i think she blocked you.
Like
· Reply · 3h
Schalk Burger
Judy Edelstein what do you mean?
Like
· Reply · 3h
Active
Gary Gevisser
Schalk Burger, it is now 2:05 PM Calif. time, and if you are in South Africa which is most likely, it is 12:05 AM Tuesday, 18 January 2022.
-
-
- 1
Like
· Reply · 2h
Active
Gary Gevisser
9 odd minutes have now elapsed since I made everyone aware of the time in California as well as South Africa which had Mr. Schalk Burger responding with a “thumbs up” without saying what else is keeping him awake at this hour, assuming he is in South Africa.Also during this passage of time which can never be made up, more people will have seen what got Judy Epstein’s attention.
No less important, unless we can read her mind, is that Schalk Burger’s question, “Judy Edelstein what do you mean?” could have triggered her desire to wipe the slate clean.
Mr. Burger, let me ask you, are you able to see on your computer screen Ms. Edelstein’s comments?
Like
· Reply · 2h
Schalk Burger
Gary Gevisser yes. I can see her responses
Like
· Reply · 2h · Edited
Schalk Burger
Gary Gevisser but also…it is over my bed time so i have to sleep now.
Like
· Reply · 2h
Active
Gary Gevisser
Schalk Burger are you saying that this Judy Edelstein is still active on facebook, only that she has managed to block me from seeing her two responses?
Like
· Reply · 1h
Schalk Burger
Gary Gevisser she is not active but she did block you, yes.
Like
· Reply · 1h
- 1
-
Active
Write a reply…
David Douglas
They earned it
Like
· Reply · 5h
Jeffrey Zikhali
Have been in the West Coast and saw how Afrikaans farmers are changing a semi desert into a garden.Have friends in Vredendal who told me wonderful stories of the canal that was built over 300 years ago and is still a lifeline.
“Any nation that can change a semi desert into a garden, is surely blessed by God” ~ Jeffrey Zikhali
- 3
Like
· Reply · 5h
Malohle Mampane
The Treaty of Vereeniging is pictured below. On top of the Afrikaaners retaining their land, they were paid £3 000 000 in reparations by Britain. Stop believing anything that shows up on Facebook. Much of it is absolutely rubbish.
-
Like
· Reply · 4h · Edited
Schalk Burger
Malohle Mampane so what is your issue? Technically the Vrede van Vereniging has nothing to do with you?
Like
· Reply · 3h
Malohle Mampane
Schalk Burger another one. What are you saying? That the Iran-Iraq War didn’t concern me means I’m precluded to enter in to discussions about it? Are historians supposed to study only the history that affects them directly? I wonder why we were convinced that white people received superior education in apartheid years if this is its products.
Like
· Reply · 3h
Schalk Burger
Malohle Mampane yes you are precluded in a discussion about it if you try to push a false narrative for your own personal gain
Like
· Reply · 2h
Malohle Mampane
Schalk Burger what is false about the document ( The treaty)I posted? The only person who posted falsehood here is the creator of this thread. Are you unable to comprehend even that simple and straightforward fact?
Like
· Reply · 2h
Schalk Burger
Malohle Mampane there is nothing false about it, but
1) it has nothing to do with you.
2) and 2 i get the idea you are desperately wanting to use the Sterling 3 mill as proof of some kind of Afrikaner privilege.
Like
· Reply · 2h
Malohle Mampane
Schalk Burger I read history of all nations of the world. And I’ll continue to do so. Whether you like it or not is something that doesn’t concern me, it concerns only you. Still shocked at what I saw tonight. I’ve met dumb people before but you have just been a totally new revelation to me.
Like
· Reply · 2h · Edited
Schalk Burger
Malohle Mampane not a broblem. Then go well then.
Like
· Reply · 2h
-
Active
Write a reply…
Active
Gary Gevisser
-
Like
· Reply · 3h
Active
Gary Gevisser
Rian Geldenhuys, are you removing my posts as I provide a backup of what Judy Edelstein has removed, in order to confuse the reader?
Like
· Reply · 3h
Active
Gary Gevisser
Rian and everyone else watching this board, and let’s not forget the others who I initially tagged, this conversation I consider of great importance, as distressing as it is for those with a big ego.I have now made a backup of this wall and will repost it on my fb wall as well as elsewhere including my BLOG on 2facetruth.com.
- 2FACETRUTH.COM
2facetruth.comLike
· Reply · Remove Preview · 3h
Active
Gary Gevisser
Rian Geldenhuys, I see now that my posts following Judy Edelstein removing her responses, have now mysteriously reappeared.That is good.
Like
· Reply · 3h
Active
Gary Gevisser
It is now 1:16 PM Calif. time, 17 January 2022.I will shortly be providing more commentary.
Like
· Reply · 3h
ActiveGary Gevisser
While we wait for Schalk Burger to respond to my earlier question,”are you saying that this Judy Edelstein is still active on facebook, only that she has managed to block me from seeing her two responses?” just 5 odd minutes ago, and it is now 12:30 AM in South Africa and Schalk might be already asleep, we should pause and analyze what is going on.
Like
· Reply · 1h · Edited
ActiveGary Gevisser
Everyone here who has commented along with those just playing voyeur hoping to get more information-knowledge without revealing who they are, knows that what caused this Judy Epstein who I believe is from Montreal, Quebec, Canada, at least that is what I remember seeing in her fb profile before she hit the block, to go “ape shit” is what bothers everyone.A chicken with its head cut off can still move around until all its nerve endings finish their decomposing.
Us humans are decomposing from the very beginning, and as our bodies atrophy we think that we are getting smarter with age when in fact it is clearly quite the opposite.
You are all only finding out in the past few hours that all trade comes down to weapon systems.
Who is in control of the weapons changes all the time because people die, get sick, and they are replaced by others who also can think for themselves even if they have to follow orders and execute the orders they don’t agree with.
Like
· Reply · 1h
ActiveGary Gevisser
The fact that no one here has commented on what it means to them personally that they have got everything wrong about the conflicts throughout the globe, starting with those in South Africa is not insurmountable, but you do have to deal with your ego which is harder to control when you have committed yourself to a certain narrative that is totally wrong.
Like
· Reply · 1h
ActiveGary Gevisser
The fact that you can also go back in time and find that generations before you also got the logic all wrong does not help especially if you have placed weight on what others have told you and you just keep repeating the same old bullshit narratives.
Like
· Reply · 1h
ActiveGary Gevisser
How can you possibly explain to yourself that you never figured that those who profit from war on militarily weaker peoples to steal the land and the minerals wouldn’t insulate themselves by pushing an educational curriculum that fails to encourage questioning?
Like
· Reply · 1h
ActiveGary Gevisser
It is now 2:42 PM California time and I will write as if Ms. Judy Epstein is still watching like the rest of you.Moreover, those of you who need to sleep, should get their sleep in, but that doesn’t mean they should assume that my audience here is getting smaller.
Like
· Reply · 1h
ActiveGary Gevisser
Title: ChildrenJudy Edelstein, it would have been better, much better if instead of “blocking” me, removing your two responses, as well as unfriending me, that you had simply taken a deep breath.
Best of course would have been to express yourself clearly why you felt so strongly, “i have to agree w you”, although as I pointed out, you could simply have said, “I agree with you” followed by, “I am quite literally shocked out of my mind that I had never thought about all this trading in real estate being a bunch of hogwash and no less comforting that it is the entire, global, human population, from the poorest to the richest who have got it all wrong; and so why not convene a meeting of everyone including all the clergy to figure a way out of this mass psychosis that makes us so ugly and mean!”.
Again, you could simply have taken a deep breath awaiting this follow up.
More than 5 hours havepassed since my earlier response, “…Ego right?” at 9:40 AM Calif. time.
Before I began speaking again at 12:57 PM, “I would like to make note of the following …”, that more than 3 hour time gap must have seemed like a lifetime for Ms. Judy Edelstein and everyone else watching.
Mark Zuckerberg, unless he has had a stroke, would be paying attention, as would fellow South African, Elon Musk, given my previous, time prescient writings on social media which didn’t emerge from the vacuum of empty space.
There is cause and effect for everything.
Just as important we know there is no such thing as empty space, only space that we cannot see with our limited eyesight, and our scientific instruments also have limitations, and nor do all of them such as radiation therapy do the body always good, because they mostly do great harm.
Medical doctors even in a best case scenario only extend life a few years; and the big question is what are we doing here; and second, why are we doing so much harm when we have the clear option of doing everything right?
Doing the smart thing and getting the initial education about wars right, which would mean identifying all those who profit the most from the wars which is not the poor of the world, can only result in good for the planet and the overwhelming majority of its inhabitants including the other animals and all sealife; not just the politicians whose job is to instill fear, distrust and to leave it to them to administer war, drugs, justice and the monies.
Really, how much good has the human done since it’s arrival?
Logic must apply at all times, even if it turns out that all humans are the most illogical specie to have ever been created, and prefer the path of self-destruction rather than tend to their unhealthy, oversized egos.
No other specie has intentionally killed itself off in pursuit of money.
And while it fixates on buying and selling perfect grammar applications in order to get the best speaking job, to top off this insanity money at-all-cost pursuit, most all of them don’t know the first thing about the money because they are totally ignorant of war.
How can you explain everyone never thinking that the money was dictated by success or failure on the battlefield?
Like
· Reply · 1h · Edited
ActiveGary Gevisser
Page 2 – ChildrenCan you imagine a 12 year old who is still playing with toy soldiers getting it wrong?
What about an adult playing Monopoly. Didn’t it occur to them that this board game is all part of the indoctrination, not to question logically?
Wouldn’t it make sense to promote successful real estate developers as the epitome, the crown jewel of the capitalist system victory over socialism and communism?
If you notice, my former long time client, multi-billionaire Solly Krok with whom I share 221 odd facebook friends, has not untagged himself, or for that matter unfriended me.
When he first hired me back in 1989, he knew that I was not a fool just because I was articulate and only spoke when I had something important to say.
He was 60 years of age at the time, one of the most visible, if not the most visible South African on the international scene.
I was 32 at the time, and more than capable of picking up the phone to any Captain of Industry without having to talk much to their personal assistant.
Schalk Burger, I see that you haven’t gone to sleep. Let me read what you have just this moment commented.
Like
· Reply · 1h
ActiveGary Gevisser
Children – P3Schalk Burger, I see that 3 minutes ago you wrote, “Gary Gevisser she is not active but she did block you, yes.”
Let me then ask you, are you able to messenger her and to ask why she is so bothered by the truth?
Like
· Reply · 1h
ActiveGary Gevisser
Children – P4Today, Solly Krok is going on 93 and Im going on 65; and more importantly, I am no less healthy than I was at age 32 when I was in pretty good physical shape, as it has been more than a decade since Ive been vegan and for more than a decade before that I was vegetarian until discovering that dairy-liquified meat-cheese-milk was worse than than poison meat.
Maybe if we teach the children to replace the word “meat” with “flesh” they will turn out much smarter.
Now imagine how much smarter Solly Krok would be today if he turned vegan when in his mid-50s, better yet if he had never once digested flesh.
The fact that 2500 years ago the first and greatest mathematician-philosopher, Pythagoras who discovered the Right Angle Triangle Theorem, warned us that the killing of other animals would lead to the death of humanity doesn’t mean that he was wrong, and therefore we should ignore everything he had to say.
Instead being a rational specie we should learn from our mistakes and simply improve the educational system beginning with the curriculum that makes us all so stupid which leads to resentment, ugliness and meanness of the highest order.
If we can’t accomplish that then we must consider that us humans are not in control, period.
Like
· Reply · 53m
ActiveGary Gevisser
Children – P5Let me be equally clear on the importance of not being able to predict, either perfect nature or coincidences of perfect nature which should not only have us all humble, but on the same page to fix logically the problems of the world, versus relying on people whose job is to create problems and point fingers away from themselves.
Another humbling experience should be of how impossible it is to predict the original Big Bang some 13.8 billion years ago; and from this impossible chaos to comprehend comes the emergence of mathematics to lend itself to the study of physics, and all the rest of this exquisite order we see all around us; and it is pleasing to the eyes and our inner soul that we can make sense of it because we are supposedly a conscious animal, eager to make rational choices.
But we go for ugliness and mean; our biggest kicks when the ugliness-meanness is directed at the good sharing important knowledge.
So of course you have to ask yourself whether people like Boris Johnson, Macron, Merkle etc and their predecessors as well as successors, are either totally stupid or the greatest actors as they each feign they are representing the best interests of their constituents.
Everyone knows that Hollywood is systemically corrupt as the actors have to bend over from their first audition, but at their ceremonies they dress up on monkey suits and heap words of praise toward one another and their prose is no less convincing, all because they are money rich and you haven’t questioned previously who dishes out the money?
Money indicates to you credibility, and you would expect how you feel towards people rich as part of the initial planning, along with pushing patriotism along with disliking people who are different to you in their looks, language, culture, especially if they are poorer and have nowhere to run from the dictators we place in charge of their exodus towards refugee status.
Like
· Reply · 43m · Edited
ActiveGary Gevisser
Children – P6It would make sense that I would choose the study of economics, have to purchase expensive and heavy text books, not always great for the posture, and knowing that contained within was total crap from start to finish, given my background, heaped in the knowledge of the very little known to the masses outside of South Africa, German-South African Oppenheimer family whose patriarch, Harry Oppenheimer was my first client after graduating from the University of Natal-Kwazulu where I wasn’t the dumbest economics student, far from it, even though I knew from the very first moment I opened the economics text book at the first lecture of Economics I, it was going to take monumental concentration in order to listen to the rubbish coming out of the lecturer’s mouth; and fully aware that this would go on for another 3 years.
BTW, that first lecture took place in early 1975, having matriculated from high school just months before, and still 17 when many of my classmates, who didn’t make it to university, were in basic training before participating in the SA Oppenheimers’ orchestrated, most bloody 27 odd year Angolan War which ended in 2002, before the founding of both TESLA and Facebook.
Why is that important?
When you wage war on the people you have a plan such as commerce when it ends.
Perhaps I should explain the above with less words, “… plan … when it ends.”
Logically thinking, you would expect the plan to bring in also war-propagandists, masked as peace and justice advocates who argue, “All men are created equal …” that in turn breeds debaters on both sides of the argument.
But amazingly, impossible to predict amongst all the talkers, all is quiet when it comes to the SA Oppenheimers who continue to gauge the behavior of their subjects, and they remain pleased.
How do you explain why it is that over the course of more than 17 odd years since breaking my 24 year deafening silence with the SA Oppenheimers, not a single person has been willing to confront the SA Oppenheimers who are most prominent in Professor Edward Jay Epstein’s epic 1978 non-fiction book, The Diamond Invention
https://edwardjayepstein.com/diamond/prologue.htm
which is free on The Internet – just click on the link above, start reading, and welcome to the real “Dog Eat A Dog” [DEAD] world.
- EDWARDJAYEPSTEIN.COM
Prologue – The Diamond InventionPrologue – The Diamond Invention
Like
· Reply · Remove Preview · 34m
ActiveGary Gevisser
Children – P7So please don’t direct your anger towards me unless your goal is to please the SA Oppenheimers and their shills.
Let me give you very quickly my pertinent background; namely, my decision to wait 24 years once leaving the inner sanctums of SA Oppenheimers-De Beers-Bank of England is because I could predict the behavior of the people when going one-on-one and talking to small groups of people who would be more likely to stab me in the back than if I was able to reach that many more who wouldn’t want to be the last one to hear the truth.
The previous paragraph matches the succinct manner I turned upside down the world of every financially rich as well as educated person in my writings earlier.
Moreover, each of the minuscule number of people who were most likely the first to read, “Why is it … ego” that was followed by Einstein’s ingenious assessment of the little knowledge-imagination human, have the ability to start a chain reaction, were it not for your egos.
What if you could get spectacularly rich organizing a worldwide gathering and also know that you are doing the right thing?
Probably not, because your ego is simply too big and you would prefer to stand on the sidelines acting disinterested, not expecting anyone to move.
We are experiencing a lack of rational thinking which people like Albert Einstein and Afrikaner Jan Christiaan Smuts and their friend, Mossad head, first Prime Minister of Israel, David Ben Gurion would have likely predicted, but it is unlikely they would have conceived of The Internet.
So imagine if Albert Einstein were still alive today and as sharp as he ever was, would you listen to him?
Would it matter to you if he was not the richest person in the world?
Of course not.
Let me then ask each of you, is there someone out there who you respect so much that you would like to hear them debate me?
Yes, the human is clearly the Alien Invader (AI) of this amazing space capsule Mother Earth which most recent modern man has destroyed at an exponential rate over the past 3 decades, and it all beginning at the turn of the last century when sensitive women took to the streets of Trafalgar Square, London protesting the British vulgarity, imprisoning and starving to death in concentration camps Afrikaner-Boer women and children as well as tens of thousands of native, black South Africans who had thrown in their lot with the Boers, many of whom turned to their Bible, “hewers of wood and drawers of water” as justification for the theft of their darker skinned relatives’ ancestral lands which had no border fences.
That is not to suggest the indigenous peoples weren’t mean or didn’t fight amongst each other before their white relatives returned with only 2 things; a gun; and second, less pigmentation in their skin having traveled north away from the equator in search of greener pastures.
Rather my point being that the returning whites were barbaric hypocrites to suggest that they would now be civilizing their former close relative “children”.
Like
· Reply · 21m
30 total views, 30 views today