On Nov 1, 2016, at 3:54 PM, gg <gary@2facetruth.com> wrote:

Shmuel – Let me first of all say, that I believe, you are contributing to the murder of my mother Zena.

 

I will kindly explain.

 

You have heard of people doing the wrong thing for financial gain?

 

You have even heard of conspiracies during the Nazi period where the Nazi bankers offered ransom monies to save Hungarian Jews from the gas chambers, even though nothing came of out it, other than the Nazi bankers knew who to silence when World War II ended.

 

Maybe you haven’t heard of the Jewish Holocaust?

 

Are you aware of Jewish people besides for the Jewish French Rothschild family who profited from The Holocaust?

 

When you were studying law in the United States before becoming an American lawyer and then deciding to specialize in “Jewish Law” did you lose your common sense?

 

Without common sense, what do you have?

 

How much do you think your aunt who put you up to this would be earning today if my mother and I hadn’t engineered Deborah Sturman Esq. to go to law school, become a licensed lawyer in the United States and in no time gather billions of dollars in restitution for Jewish Holocaust slave survivors?

 

How much do you think an out of worker French Horn player for the Cologne Philharmonic earns?

 

Would you be taking direction from Deborah if you saw her today lining up at a food kitchen line?

 

Is your fundamental problem that you don’t want to believe in conspiracies that don’t suit your agenda?

 

I suggest you quickly get your head around Professor Tuvia Friling’s ARROWS IN THE DARK, either by calling him now, leave messages on the voicemail of every professor at Ben Gurion University as well as the Golani Brigade just in case he has decided to reenlist as deputy commander, or try reaching out to someone who knows what he wrote, because I want to assure you that you do not have the time to either order ARROWS IN THE DARK off the Internet even if Mr. Bozos hand delivers it to your front doorstep, or for that matter going to your local library. That is simply because my follow up response to your dribble below is going to come very shortly.

 

When we spoke on Sunday, the Christian Sabbath, you said that you didn’t have time to do anything more for me personally, because you were up to your eyeballs in the practice of “Jewish Law” in Israel. What I read below is very different, even if you and your aunt Deborah Sturman Esquire disagree 100%.

 

Morally, I believe you are on very shaky ground because I believe you are walking on very thin ice.

 

Nor do I believe for a single moment that you were out to best protect my mother or Lance Zulman, but rather what is in your personal best interest; namely to appease your aunt.

 

You never thought that I would dig further, and just go off “half cocked” at my Wicked Witch of the East [WWE] sister Kathy and her Israeli liar-lawyer Ayala Weisel. No doubt they are problematic but so is your aunt. 

 

If you haven’t figured it out, she is using you.

 

She is not responding to my kind gesture to step forward and get directly involved herself because she wants it all to be smooth sailing so that when she gets court approval to be Alan Zulman’s executor, then she will also have a big say in my mother’s replacement guardian and that would have her socking it to both my mother and me as Deborah stirring the pot also dilly dallies, and inevitably deciding in her infinite wisdom, that unless all 4 of my mother’s children can agree amongst ourselves on the question of guardianship of my mother, then it should be a court appointed guardian.

 

There is a reason why it is that you don’t want to hear that my British citizen mother Zena has spoken clearly and eloquently on why she wants me as her guardian.

 

She doesn’t want you or your Rebbe Schneerson.

 

My mother does not want your aunt Deborah Sturman Esq.

 

My mother does not want Prime Minister Netanyahu as her guardian even if he didn’t have his personal problems.

 

My mother is perfectly clear that she does not want my 3 elder siblings as her guardian.

 

Do you not know how to listen?

 

Have you been diagnosed as deaf or simply stupid?

 

In the interim as you delay, delay, delay, not only will my mother’s health dramatically decline but then I will look more than stupid for going along with this circus, and that will in turn weaken my credibility to attack the billions of dollars in Holocaust monies that have been circulating amongst the hungry lawyers.

 

How would you compare your logic to mine?

 

Would you like to solve this dispute between your aunt and myself by a chess game?

 

I am willing to do anything reasonable to expose all you flakes.

 

It is very convenient for you all to have decided that my mother has “advanced dementia” as you worked her to the bone so that she couldn’t speak her mind in how atrocious are all you scum who are all about the money.

 

But now you are royally screwed.

 

All you can say with your kippah-skullcap no doubt on your head, is “was interested”.

 

Who taught you to write sloppy English?

 

You are putting on an act just like the Israeli judge Yocheved Greenvald-Rand did in court at my Restraining Order hearing on October 5. Both her and liar-lawyer Ayala Weisel’s eyes were bulging out of their eyes.

 

9 minutes and 24 seconds, how many babies do you religious Jewish people have on average after love-making?

 

Were it not for me bringing this “class action” you would be drooling over the monies pouring in from the legal and medical malpractice liability insurance carriers.

 

You are an American but that does not mean you cannot speak normal and proper English or was that simply a Freudian slip?

 

I want you when you come back to me, and I am only talking about a matter of how long it takes me to eat and digest my lunch, to explain yourself very clearly in terms what exactly “was interested”?

 

Let me help you.

 

Were you curious to see it again because you surely saw it the first time, or that after studying it and seeing how very exposed you all are, you decided that you were not longer interested?

 

Would you prefer that the video did not exist?

 

Do not answer these questions as though you are under oath in a sworn deposition.

 

Only answer them based on what your conscience tells you is morally right.

 

Now check out the last uploads on the BLOG of my website 2facetruth.com. [CLICK HERE & CLICK HERE].

 

They are self-explanatory. You will also see me making mention going back to January 14 of this year, the day after I visited with my mother Zena of how convenient that my mother has been labelled as being in a mental state of “advanced dementia”.

 

“Was interested” my arse!

 

Anyone who has had anything to do with either the healthcare of my mother or her financial matters that you know directly impact an individual’s mental as well as physical health who has DARED to even suggest let alone tell the whole world that my mother has “advanced dementia” is a lying son of bitch.

 

That is for starters.

 

Anyone who mislabels someone with a most serious neurological disease, that has them losing their right of body and financial affairs, has a very nefarious agenda.

 

Shame on you!

 

PS – What were you thinking in calling the video of my mother a “movie”? You must be thinking it is a long amount of time to be lucid for someone who is in “advanced dementia”.

 

[Word count 1317]

 

On Nov 1, 2016, at 6:09 AM, דבורה לואיס <devora0527678711@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Gary 

I did indeed see the movie and was interested. 

regarding Nissim Shalem i spoke to him and he says there is of course 

such a thing as a proceeding to change guardianship but that he feels

he cannot work for it in this case as he would have a clash of interests

as Arye’s representative. that goes for myself as well i am afraid and so 

i wish you good luck through this all

with regard

 Shmuel   

2016-10-31 16:58 GMT+02:00 GaryStevenGevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com>:

Dear Shmuel – did you hear back from Nissim Shalem? What did you think of the video?

 

Shalom

 

Gary

On Oct 30, 2016, at 1:23 PM, GaryStevenGevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com> wrote:

Deborah –  We are talking about my mother’s care that should have everyone including you rising to the occasion, which explains why Shmuel is involved.

 

I have now spoken with Shmuel. I did not realize that when he wrote to me that he was your nephew.

 

He says that you still haven’t heard from Symon but that you have an Israeli lawyer, Nissim Shalem who has filed with the courts Alan’s final will, naming both you and Symon as executor.

 

I have asked Shmuel to speak with Nissim, who he believes doesn’t speak English, to see if he can petition on my behalf to replace Weisel as my mother’s guardian for failure to perform her duties, as they leave it to Lance to pay the bills; another one to then blame as they drive Lance off his rocker.

 

I am of course prepared to return to Israel to take care of my mother but only once I am appointed guardian. What we went through was nothing short of hell, and yes it was all premeditated when Weisel-Symon failed to inform me that Weisel had been granted guardianship 6 days before I arrived. They are now very wounded animals and would stop at nothing to have me arrested under false charges. For good reason, I have no faith in the Israeli justice system. That is reinforced by us having met with 4 lawyers and spoken with an additional equal amount. They are not incompetent, because they are total thieves. Every Israeli who hasn’t referred me to a lawyer friend says it is not possible to find in Israel an honest lawyer or judge. Bottom line, I’m not prepared to go through or have my French-Canadian wife Marie Dion ever experience again such malice by thieving lawyers acting on instruction from my sister.

 

Again, had I known that the judge who presided over my restraining order hearing was the same judge who granted Weisel the guardianship I would have raised hell in the courtroom because the judge was totally blown away by the video of my mother that she wanted to see because curiosity got the better of her. Twice that video was played and you could see the judge looking back and forth at Weisel and I thought that the judge was going to come down on Weisel like a ton of bricks, but in fact they were both figuring the best way out of this total fraud. Then to my horror, the judge allowed Weisel to go into a rage in an effort to distract; and nor did the judge or my lawyers rein Weisel in.

 

You cannot be medically diagnosed as having “advanced dementia” and then able to articulate so well, so calmly as my mother did in explaining the pros and cons about this issue of guardianship. The fact that they continue to protest that my mother is in “advanced dementia” should have long by now resulted in Weisel and my siblings’ prosecution; but where do you begin in such a systemically rotten system?

 

It is absolute even if you have witnessed repeatedly my mother in a total state of lack of consciousness of what is around her. How would you react if you couldn’t trust the people around you and you were my mother’s age? 

 

I will tell what you would do. You would do exactly as my mother did, and ask me first to come to Israel and then you too would hope you are capable of being as clear minded, calm and so conscious of the world around her, and remember not a single “um” coming out of my mother’s mouth and how ladylike she adjusted her dress as I moved closer directly in front of her. Nothing in the least bit staged. Only purity of the highest order. There is no memory with advanced dementia. My mother not only remembers well all the pros and cons of her children, and so consistent with our phone conversations, but all the important places in the world she would still like to visit.

 

How can my very good mother be treated so poorly.

 

Also as I told Shmuel you only know part of the story behind me not seeing my mother in 15 years. After my and Alan Zulman’s fallout in December 2001, that very evening I walked to Minehead which is a 40 minute very slow drive from Wive and purchased a bed and breakfast on the ocean front without even entering the property. I spoke with the two owners, an English lady and her South African husband as they leaned out the living room area and I was standing on the street. They had taken down the FOR SALE sign that day. I only knew about it because I happened to ask a neighbor further down the street if he knew of a property for sale by its owner. 

 

The purpose was for my mom to have a place to go to in the event Alan went totally off the deep end. Nor did I think it important to blab my mouth to anyone. Bear in mind once Alan realized that he was clueless about my and my mother’s knowledge of the politics-economics of South Africa so he was smart enough to figure that all his fund raising efforts in South Africa for Israel had to be total bullshit given how my mother had encouraged him more than anyone. My mom even explained to him how exactly to go about shaming rich Jewish South Africans to give “until it hurt” without my mother mentioning that she was so very close to people who were publicly doing nothing short of advocating violence against Israel, starting with my mother’s very close friend, Indian Muslim activist Fatima Meer who made virulently anti-Semitic and anti-Israel speeches on my University of Natal campus, when I knew to be quiet. 

 

But Fatima Meer also stayed alive and had encircling her very untrustworthy people, no different to my mother, which allowed them to keep that much more careful watch of these “fair weathered friends” and many of them famous white South African names inclulding Alan Paton, who were simply very well paid spies, and not all that great actors. You should be able to follow all this. And this history is important because everyone is making a big deal about the 15 year gap, although Weisel said it was 18 years.

 

I kept that very poor investment where I never stayed one full night; and nor did I receive more than a token couple hundred quid in rental income for more than 6 years.

 

What is most important is how my mother proceeded to investigate my purchase of Seacrest. The investigation was an investigation of both Alan and more importantly Neil. She first sent Neil to look. Neil said that with the oceans rising Seacrest would soon be under water. Alan came along and couldn’t believe his eyes that the property was in “nick condition”, at least compared to anything else they had come across on the ocean. Alan knew that I was buying it at rock bottom price even though the property had been on the market a while, but it was at the end of the beach road leading in to a forest that walkers from all over England and beyond made, almost a pilgrimage for some as there was this Burgundy Chapel that people believe John the Baptist had preached at. My mother Zena knew exactly what I was up to, and then put on a whole song and dance agreeing with Neil that this would end up being a disaster and the sellers were just trying to steal my money. That was enough to distract Alan. Suffice to say the purchase went through very quickly, and now they all had something to talk about other than Fatima Meer. True to form Neil continued to visit the property reporting to everyone that the place was vacant and would soon be underwater.

 

Yes, there is a streak to Neil that you probably didn’t know. Maybe you should take a closer look under the kimono of his young girlfriend.

 

Remember, there is a whole bunch of cash-valuables missing from Wive and Kathy tried to prepare an alibi when having Neil tell Kerry Anderson that the house was not being lived in, and that Kerry should not let anyone know, as if Kerry didn’t know that my mother and Alan were in Israel. It should all be starting to add up.

 

Having me as my mother’s guardian puts to an end my siblings efforts to most of all place my mother in an early grave and grab the money.

 

Smuel mentioned that he had yet to see the Youtube video I put up of my mother after I returned from our month long trip and which I filmed on Thursday, September 22.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dL4qdY7ESzE

 

My plan is to write to Kathy soon asking-demanding that I replace Weisel as my mother’s guardian.

 

Let me know if I have missed anything.

 

Shalom,

 

Gary

 

 

 

Begin forwarded message:

From: דבורה לואיס <devora0527678711@gmail.com>

Subject: your mother Zena Zulman

Date: October 27, 2016 at 8:13:31 AM PDT

To: garystevengevisser@gmail.com

Dear Gary 

 

I am writing to you on behalf of your mother Zena. I write to you as I understand that you may still be in Israel.

 

As a friend of Arye zulman it has come to my attention that the funds he used to support your mother and her household were cut off and that he can no longer be involved in her affairs.

 

 This has been mentioned to your mothers guardian Ayala Vizel and i do know that she has funds enough. however so far she has not stirred herself in any way and i worry that now without Arye’s help your mother may be plunged into darkness by the electric company or some such thing. 

 

 best regards

 

yours 

 

The OSS had determined, however, that tons of diamonds were somehow reaching Nazi Germany. If the De Beers system of “elaborate controls” was as effective as the War Department held, how could such enormous quantities of diamonds be regularly reaching Germany? To answer this question, the OSS had proposed sending its own undercover agents from its field office in Accra to the Belgian Congo. Since the British Ministry of Economic Warfare was responsible for allied activities in the Congo, this OSS action had to be cleared in London. At first the ministry blocked the request, and then it had proposed a joint “diamond investigation.” OSS agents met with their British counterparts, but little was done to pinpoint the source of the smuggling. Finally the OSS chief in Accra reported to Washington, D.C.:

“We have now come to the conclusion (a) that our assistance was requested in this program so that the Diamond Trading Corporation might discover how much we actually knew of the ramifications of the De Beers world monopoly, and (b) that the OSS/Accra recommendations for a Security Committee were sabotaged, not by the British Government, but by the representatives of the Diamond Trading Corporation, Ltd., London, through their domination of the Diamond Committee of the Ministry of Economic Warfare.”

More on Fleming’s bio; cutting and pasting Wikipedia:

 

Fleming also worked with Colonel “Wild Bill” Donovan, President Franklin D. Roosevelt‘s special representative on intelligence co-operation between London and Washington. In May 1941 Fleming accompanied Godfrey to the United States, where he assisted in writing a blueprint for the Office of the Coordinator of Information, the department that turned into the Office of Strategic Services and eventually became the CIA.

 

There was no committee within the British Ministry of Economic Warfare more important than the critical Diamond Committee, because without diamonds both to produce precision tooling to manufacture quickly and expertly mass weapons of war as well as a currency to trade with De-Beers-Ernest Oppenheimer’s partners such as the American Rockefeller family for oil.

 

You must have heard of the Rockefeller’s IG Farben gas pellet production facility within the extraordinary Auschwitz death factory which was not mentioned during the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunals [1946-47].

 

What influence do you think the Rockefeller family have on Israel’s Yad Vashem Holocaust Memorial Museum or the abundant spread throughout the world where you don’t find a single placard at the entrance giving the list of names of those who paid handsomely not to be prosecuted at Nuremberg or anytime since.

 

Could you see this as the work of Mossad and/or the Hand of God?

 

Note Gili Diamond of Yad Vashem is not the only individual/group included in the cc section.

 

There was no Oil Committee because without the strategic importance of “diamond dust” particles as well as diamonds’ untraceable qualities, and both in the hands of one individual, virulent anti-Semite and anti-Israel, Sir Ernest Oppenheimer [1880-1957] who refused to provide an inventory of his diamond holdings, and nor have De Beers changed that decision, there would not have been World War II; meaning no 300 death factories supported by the 42,500 slave camps dispersed throughout Nazi Germany-Poland.

 

That is right, forget breaking any of the rules following the end of World War I, Versailles Peace Conference, Nazi Germany-Hitler could never have built up an army.

 

Where am I going with all this?

 

First, there is nothing to suggest that those 6 million Jewish people murdered would have turned out any worse; nor is there any evidence that they would have turned out better.

 

They are all dead, plus the tens of millions of other innocent victims who are none the worse because they are dead.

 

So we must look to the future to make sure it does not happen again.

 

That means we have to make a careful study of all the profiteers who escaped prosecution at Nuremberg and all the subsequent nonsense investigations and criminal prosecutions of nobodies.

 

Have you ever heard of a monopolist when providing its financial statements including balance sheet not having to account for it’s inventory of diamonds?

 

Can you imagine Intel not providing its auditors an accurate value of its inventory of microprocessors? Of course you could, because you know that there are cheats in all management.

 

But we are not talking about a false inventory number given by De Beers and their favorite clients beginning with Europe’s biggest branded name, Barclays Bank who feature in WARRING WITH ISRAEL who now has to import slaves from the Phillipines and Thailand for her people “to make ends meet”; and the poor of Israel, starting with Israelis lived the most terrible, miserable lives, and I would know because I was there in January and saw the entire breadth and depth of this forsaken country that has lost its soul to the vulgarity of the money that is controlled by the same Oppenheimer monsters who engineered as well as executed not only our Jewish Holocaust but all the coverup Holocausts that have followed.

 

De Beers have never provided any number for their diamond inventory that can be verified by independent government regulators because De Beers have refused to be regulated just like they told their puppet President Franklin D. Roosevelt to go jump in the lake when he demanded, at Sir Ernest Oppenheimer’s instruction to stockpile 6.5 million carats of industrial diamonds on US soil; and when Roosevelt failed to send out the OSS assassins unit to execute both Ernest and his son Harry, it was not only the German-South African Oppenheimer family who celebrated but all their partners including the Jewish French Rothschild family.

 

Today, the Rothschilds, Oppenheimers, Rockefellers and company say most great things about Israel and their critics know not to rock the boat too much.

 

You remember the photo

showing the US military officer kneeling before King Ibn Saud on board the USS Quincy on Great Bitter Lake, with crippled President Franklin D. Roosevelt looking on.

 

Do you recall if Roosevelt ever mentioned if his crippled legs affected his memory?

 

Have you ever turned on the stove to heat up soup and forgot because you got distracted with something as innocent as taking a 10 minute cat nap?

 

Can you think of any “occassion” [sic] during WW II when the Commander In Chief of all US Armed Forces issued a directive as important as the stockpiling of 6.5 million carats of diamonds on US soil and the monopolist who was supplying both sides to war and therefore couldn’t possibly lose told the Commander In Chief to go fuck himself?

 

Cutting and pasting Wikipedia: Field Marshal William Edmund Ironside, 1st Baron Ironside GCB, CMG, DSO (6 May 1880 – 22 September 1959) 

 

At the end of the Anglo-American War [1899-1902], he was a member of the small force which escorted Jan Smuts to the peace negotiations. 

 

While Fleming visited the set of the Goldfinger movie in April 1964 and died later on August 12, 1964, he would not have forgotten either why Goldfinger preceded Diamonds are Forever or that he had forgotten that he was instrumental in not only writing the blueprint for the OSS-CIA but it’s implementation.

 

His close friend Engelhard Jr. would also not have objected to the book Goldfinger depicting Goldfinger down to a T; not to mention in the movie, bad German-American Engelhard Jr. was played by Gert Fröbe, a very good German.

 

Let’s go back to chapter 9 and move down from Smuts’ Diamond Committee which allowed Smuts, who was second in command to Churchill, to follow Chinese General Sun Tzi’s military philosophy, when keeping his friends close, and his enemies even closer.

As the OSS pursued the investigation, it found that the diamonds were reaching the Axis powers through Tangier and Cairo. Its agents, posing as illegal buyers in these entrepots, found that industrial diamonds were being sold for $26 a carat, which was thirty times the official price. It became increasingly clear that enormous profits were being made on the millions of carats that were being smuggled into Germany. Tracing their way back through the chain of illegal sellers, an OSS agent code-named Teton reported back from Leopoldville that “the major source of leakage was the Forminiere Mines,” which had been under the control of the syndicate ever since they were developed. According to the OSS report, Teton, pretending to be an American official who had come to the Congo to register “all American males of draft age,” made highly productive “contact” in Leopoldville and eventually turned up evidence “that a full year’s supply of diamonds had reached Germany from Forminiere through Red Cross parcels.” The shipment of several million carats of diamonds through the parcels that were regularly sent from the Congo to Nazi-occupied Belgium required considerable organization and support in the intervening areas.

Like the Diamond Committee, De Beers officials had dominated every branch of the Red Cross.

 

Let’s now come back to those wanting to scold Smuts and Churchill, beginning with Churchill who was not incapacitated nor did he die during WW II when Smuts would have taken over as Prime Minister of Great Britain and South Africa.

 

The current queen of England did not fire Churchill within two months of Nazi Germany surrendering. But the current queen was in charge of giving the Nazi’s, the Duchess of Windsor, American Wallis Simpson and her husband, the abdicated King of England their Royal funerals; Simpson dying in 1986 and the Duke of Windsor, who were both regular dinner guests of German-American Charles W. Engelhard Jr., in 1972.

 

Cutting and pasting Wikipedia, Wallis Simpson:

 

Following the outbreak of war in 1939, the Duke was given a military post in the British Army stationed in France. According to the son of Lord Ironside, the Duchess continued to entertain friends associated with the fascist movement, and leaked details of the French and Belgian defences gleaned from the Duke.^[88] When the Germans invaded the north of France and bombed Britain in May 1940, the Duchess told an American journalist, “I can’t say I feel sorry for them.”^[89] As the German troops advanced, the Duke and Duchess fled south from their Paris home, first to Biarritz, then in June to Spain. There, she told the United States ambassador, Alexander W. Weddell, that France had lost because it was “internally diseased”.^[90] In July, the pair moved to Lisbon, Portugal, where they stayed at the home of Ricardo de Espirito Santo e Silva, a banker who was suspected of being a German agent.^[91] In August, the Duke and Duchess travelled by commercial liner to the Bahamas, where the Duke was installed as Governor.^[92]

Wallis performed her role as the Bahamas’ first lady competently for five years; she worked actively for the Red Cross and in the improvement of infant welfare.^[93]

The strategic importance of diamonds became acutely clear to both the Allies and Axis powers with the approach of the Second World War in 1939. Only diamonds were hard enough to stamp out the millions of precision parts that were necessary for mass-producing airplane engines, torpedoes, tanks, artillery and the other weapons of war. Only diamonds could be used to draw the fine wire needed for radar and the electronics of war. Only diamonds could provide the jeweled bearings necessary for the stabilizers, gyroscopes and guidance systems for submarines and planes. Only diamonds could provide the abrasives necessary for rapidly converting civilian industries into a war machine. Without a continuing supply of diamonds, the war machine would rapidly slow to a halt. Yet, nearly all the diamond mines remained closed, and De Beers controlled the world supply of diamonds. Obtaining these industrial diamonds thus became a paramount objective for both the United States and Hitler’s Germany.

In Washington, D.C., the administration of President Franklin D. Roosevelt began to hold emergency meetings about diamonds in 1940 when Hitler’s armies swept across Europe in a blitzkrieg and threatened to invade England. The possibility had to be at least considered that England, like France, might be overrun or surrender. In that event, the world diamond stockpile would fall into Hitler’s hands. Since the United States had less than one year’s supply of industrial diamonds, the loss of De Beers’ stockpile would make it difficult, if not impossible, to continue the war. The economic planners for the war estimated that the United ,States needed at least 6.5 million carats of industrial diamonds to convert its factories to war production.

When apprized of this critical shortage in diamonds, President Roosevelt ordered the War Production Board, which had the responsibility for mobilizing the American economy for war, to buy the necessary 6.5 million carats from De Beers. De Beers, however, had other interests to consider. Its entire system for monopolizing diamonds depended on its controlling the available stockpile. Transferring a large portion of the stockpile from London to New York City, where it would be out of its control, ran counter to the De Beers logic.

Even though the Americans persisted in the negotiations for the diamonds, they found that Sir Ernest Oppenheimer personally opposed any transfer of diamonds to the United States. He argued that if the United States had its own stockpile, and the war suddenly ended, it might release the diamonds and undercut the entire world order that he had so laboriously constructed. Moreover, he held that the United States had sufficient diamonds for present needs, and that De Beers would continue its delivery of diamonds to American manufacturers on a monthly basis. In one letter, he characterized the American demand for a stockpile as “farcical.”

The Americans were dismayed by this intransigence. In an official Justice Department memorandum, the War Production Board expressed incredulity at the fact that “the leaders of the syndicate are intentionally risking the war production of the allies.” President Roosevelt, disturbed by this development, ordered the State Department to intervene directly with Winston Churchill’s war cabinet in London.

The State Department found, however, that the British government was reluctant to press De Beers to part with the diamonds. An investigation by U.S. intelligence indicated that the division of the British government responsible for acting on the request was entirely staffed by former executives of the De Beers “syndicate.” In a secret memorandum, the War Production Board noted, “The diamond section of the government and the syndicate seem to be the same.”* After the Roosevelt administration had made continuing efforts to persuade the British government that the diamonds were of critical importance to the United States war effort, it ordered the State Department to play its trump card and threaten that the United States would interrupt the supply f airplanes that was vitally needed by the British to defend themselves against the Luftwaffe bombing raids. According to a confidential report in this Justice Department archive, dated April 16, 1942, “It was said unofficially that we would not give planes to England if the syndicate would not sell us the diamonds with which to make them.” This dramatic threat had the desired effect. The British government pressed De Beers to accommodate President Roosevelt, and De Beers yielded.

Oppenheimer agreed to supply the United States immediately with one million carats–14 percent of the American request—and deposit an additional stockpile in Canada for the duration of the war. This Canadian stockpile, which would remain under De Beers control, was meant to mitigate the American concern over the possible capture of the London stockpile.

The Roosevelt administration was not entirely satisfied with this compromise. It continued to apply pressure to the British government, demanding that De Beers supply the additional 5.5 million carats. By this time, the air of crisis had passed, and De Beers was able to procrastinate successfully. At first, it claimed that it did not have enough diamonds in its vaults to supply this amount. Then, after U.S. intelligence debunked this claim, De Beers advised that its vaults were bombed shut” in an air raid on London. A year passed. Then De Beers asserted that it needed additional time to prepare an inventory of the diamonds it had available.

By this time, American officials feared that De Beers, despite the pressure exerted on it, had no intention of allowing a diamond stockpile of any magnitude to be established, even in Canada. Moreover, manufacturers of. diamond tools in the United States had begun complaining to the Office of Price Control that De Beers had effectively raised its prices as much as 60 percent through the device of reducing the quality of the diamonds it delivered. So, though the official price per carat remained the same, manufacturers had to buy more of the lower quality diamonds to build the tools and dies for industry. Since it was exceedingly difficult for the price control officials to measure the relative quality of industrial diamonds, De Beers was able to persist in its claim that it had not raised prices. In any case, the Justice Department concluded that the De Beers monopoly, by manipulating supplies from the stockpile, could impede the war effort.

The Justice Department decided then to launch its own investigation into the diamond monopoly. It had the full cooperation of the War Production Board, which still wanted control of the diamond stockpile, and the OSS, the newly created U.S. wartime intelligence service. The Investigators were not held back by any inhibitions about intercepting mail, borrowing bank records or other such extralegal measures. They all shared a common objective: helping the war effort. In their roughshod manner, they soon began turning up bits of evidence indicating that De Beers had systematically stifled diamond mining in areas of the world over which it could not exert control. For example, intercepted letters from Oppenheimer’s associates suggested that litigation had been initiated in Venezuela to prevent Nelson Rockefeller and other Americans from developing diamond mines in that country. One such letter detailed the possibility of competition in Venezuela, and asked an intermediary to suggest to Oppenheimer that he be “ruthless in stamping it out.” Another intercepted letter from a Belgian diamond executive suggested that De Beers was intentionally exhausting the diamond mines in the Belgian Congo, while preserving its mines in South Africa, so that after the war was over De Beers “will have complete control over the market..” Justice Department investigators also looked into charges that De Beers had conspired to buy out and shut down potential diamond mining areas in the country of Guyana and the state of Arkansas.

In Arkansas, it was charged that after diamonds were found there, Oppenheimer bought control of the company that was to mine the diamonds. Then, when the separation plant built on the site failed to produce a sufficient quantity of diamonds per ton of ore to make the mine profitable, it was closed. Subsequently, it was charged that the separation plant had been designed by the engineer in such a manner that it could not possibly retrieve diamonds. It emerged that the engineer was in the employ of De Beers. The mine, which was bought out by associates of Ernest Oppenheimer, was ordered closed in 1921 after Oppenheimer met the mine officials in New York, and the mine’s records were ordered destroyed. “An inference could be drawn . . . “the Justice Department memorandum noted, “that the property was sabotaged and then closed at the insistence of Sir Ernest Oppenheimer.” The evidence was admittedly highly circumstantial.

Whatever were the specific tactics of De Beers, the justice Department investigators reached the conclusion that the singular effect of these efforts was to artificially restrain the production of diamonds. This, in turn, produced higher prices. A 1944 memorandum to the attorney general concluded, “The United States is paying monopoly prices for an essential material needed in wartime production.” If De Beers were an American company, the memorandum continued, “There would be no question as to [its] having violated the anti-trust laws.” Since De Beers was a South African corporation, the Justice Department had to demonstrate that it had some jurisdiction over its activities before it could consider prosecuting it.

The FBI was called in to interview the leading diamond dealers in New York to determine whether De Beers, which sold them diamonds, could be construed as transacting business in the United States. The FBI reported, “The domestic trade operates in relative secrecy…. The syndicate will sell only to a small group of hand-picked dealers.” It further noted that De Beers officials avoided coming to the United States, and all transactions took place in London. Further inquiry showed that De Beers had closed all its bank accounts in the United States at the outset of the investigation.

The assistant attorney generals at the Justice Department who had superintended the investigation realized that the antitrust division had little chance of ever bringing De Beers to court in the United States. Despite all the prodigious investigative efforts, the case was abandoned in late 1945.

None of these documents cast any light on the question of how Hitler continued to obtain diamonds for the duration of the war. There was, however, an investigation of this problem by the OSS, the forerunner of the CIA.

According to a summary of OSS documents, the OSS learned through its agents in Germany that in November of 1943 Hitler had only an eight-month supply of industrial diamonds. When these diamonds ran out, Hitler’s war machine would be crippled. It would no longer be possible to build V-2 rockets or other exotic weaponry. It was thus a crucial wartime goal to prevent Hitler from replenishing his supply of diamonds.

As all mines in South Africa were closed, the OSS reckoned that there was only one place on earth from which the Germans could get industrial diamonds in sufficient quantity to maintain their .military-industrial complex: the Belgian Congo. The Belgian Congo was, however, administered by the Belgian government in exile, which was in London and completely under British control. The mines themselves were supervised, and policed, by the De Beers syndicate. In fact, when the justice Department began to move against De Beers, the War Department objected on the grounds that it might undercut the security system that De Beers had developed in the Belgian Congo. In an exchange of secret correspondence between the War and Justice Departments (which was declassified under my Freedom of Information request), it was argued by an official responsible for maintaining the diamond blockade that “almost the entire [diamond] production of Africa is policed through the operation of elaborate controls extending through every mining area of the continent.” Further, De Beers, which administered this program, sent “this controlled production … in a closely guarded stream to London.”

Hillel the Elder – If I am not for myself who is for me? And being for my own self, what am ‘I’? And if not now, when?

The fourth rule: No client may resell the diamonds in his box in their uncut form without a special dispensation from Monty Charles. To maintain its international monopoly over the supply of diamonds, De Beers must control the world stockpile of uncut diamonds. If it permitted its clients to resell their boxes, some outside party could amass its own stockpile by bidding for the boxes. This actually occurred in 1977, when Israeli dealers paid a premium of up to 100 percent to De Beers clients for their unopened boxes. Many clients, seeing the opportunity to double their money overnight, took advantage of this windfall. The result was that by 1978, the stockpile in Israel was rapidly approaching in size De Beers’ own stockpile in London. If the Israelis suddenly panicked and threw their uncut diamonds on the market, the price would collapse. If the Israelis continued to amass diamonds, they would be in a position to offer their own sights and undercut the mechanism De Beers had invented for controlling the market. De Beers succeeded by gradually forcing the diamonds out of Israeli hands in 1979. To prevent a recurrence, Monty Charles insisted that clients must immediately cut and polish all the diamonds supplied to them in their boxes and then return the cardboard containers to assure that no one was selling their sealed boxes. He dramatically demonstrated that violators of this edict would be severely punished by purging some forty clients from the sights for reselling some of their uncut diamonds. His retribution was not lost on the other clients.

Israel: The going gets rough for diamonds

 

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/120bdeaa-1778-11e6-9d98-00386a18e39d.html#axzz48VpCeck6

Hi Gary –
Listen, I am putting aside this topic for awhile. However, I will contact you if I return to it. Thanks for being in touch.
Best regards,

John

Hi Gary,

 

When I got to No 22, no one answered the doorbell so I couldn’t get in.

 

 Then my phone died on me so you couldn’t call me.

 

 I came home. 

 

A bad day.

 

 I’m going to bed..

 

Ayalah

 Before commenting on the video “The Lady’s Speech” tell me

 

how many years had you not seen your Mom?

 

Ayalah

Dear Gary,
 
I have already written to you.
However a thought crossed my mind. – 
may I share this with Kathy and Neil?
I will respect whatever you say.
 

Ayalah

From: GaryStevenGevisser <garystevengevisser@gmail.com>
Subject: Share – Re: No 22
Date: November 20, 2016 at 10:50:29 PM PST

To: Ayala Kaplan

Those calls were from me trying to reach you when the phone disconnected as you got to my mother’s apartment.

You had a lot of accusatory things to say to me and now after you sling your arrows you tell me that you cannot cope.

That email I sent you was very much on point and centered around what my mother wants. It also tells you how two-faced are my siblings.

You know about birds of feather!

Don’t suddenly play stupid and victim.

My mother Zena’s life is at stake and you are quite rightly going frantic because the videos show my mother in a vastly different state of mind than what you all have been portraying. Moreover, you know how easy it is to confuse an 87 year old human as her “cage is rattled”.

You know perfectly well that my mother was not acting in those videos to hide her “advanced dementia”. Or do you think that my mother is such a good actor, she had you all fooled?

You cannot have your cake and eat it at the same time.

How long do you think you could keep up playing “advanced dementia”?

You also misled me when trying to bait me with you question?

 Before commenting on the video “The Lady’s Speech” tell me

how many years had you not seen your Mom?

You never told me that you had a problem reading or that you were already in touch with my siblings and heard all the bad they had to say about me; and you thought it wise to plonk yourself in the middle until I responded with a well thrown pitch, “Everything about your life is positive”.

Given how I now know better than to trust you, and I very much doubt you will connect me up by telephone with my mother, I must redouble my efforts to at the very least bring public international attention to her plight!

Go back to sleep!

When I get up tomorrow morning and not at 6AM as you instructed while telling me you only had 15 minutes to spare with me, and remember we are talking the quality of life of my very accomplished mother Zena who you also knew so very little about because you too were not close to her, much the same as my terrible siblings, I will be sharing everything, just as you wanted with Kathy, Neil and Melvin.

On Nov 20, 2016, at 6:27 PM, Ayala Kaplan wrote:

 

Dear Gary,

 

It is 4.30 in the morning. 

 

You are inundating me with mail and calls.

 

.I don’t have the time or energy to cope with it.

 

 Please leave me alone. 

 

I wish you well. 

 

Ayalah

 

 

1) What was she like at 22? – Zena Gevisser, Sept 22, 2016, 8:58am

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iGg8tVHPmI

 

2) She has quite a face – Zena Gevisser, Sept. 22, 2016, 9am

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gef8axe7zSk

 

3) The lady’s speech – Zena Gevisser, Sept 22, 2016, 11:33am

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dL4qdY7ESzE

 

4) IF part 1 – Zena Gevisser, September 23, 2016, 12:49 PM

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qG713hF_dU

 

5) IF part 2 – September 23, 2016, 12:49 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bl1pt_A_BnA

 

6) IF – Zena Gevisser along with IF audio, Sept 23, 2016, 12:55PM

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KInDZmVotao&feature=youtu.be

 

7) The addiction – King David Hotel, Jerusalem, Sept. 24, 2016

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXQNxCpbrFM

 

8) Teachers – King David Hotel, Jerusalem, Sept. 24, 2016

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-U6-Iwks2vE&feature=share

People with little intelligence have great difficulty feeling stupid.

What does a psychologist do if they are depressed?

 

Wouldn’t that be the first question you would ask a psychologist if you felt the need to see one?

“I don’t see how it is possible for you to develop a close relationship with your mother during the 15 years you showed great respect towards her when keeping your distance because you didn’t want to aggravate her second husband Alan Zulman who saw his world falling apart once he understood the dynamics of mineral rich South Africa”,

Zena: You are mad. She’s not 22

Gary: She looks 22

Zena: How old is she?

Gary: She’s 58

Zena: She’s 2 years off 60?

Gary: Yes

Zena: You’re crazy. You got it all wrong!

Gary: You think so?

Zena: What, did she go to have a facelift maybe?

Gary: No, never [not even a single botox treatment].

Zena: Amazing hey. Wow. How old is she?

Gary: 58

Zena: Good God; what was she like at 22?

Darren – pay attention to the dates as well as the hyperlink over, “”doors slammed in my face, right, left and center” 

THEATER; For a Bit of a Gamble, Meet Them in St. Louis

By PATRICK PACHECO; Patrick Pacheco is a freelance writer who specializes in the arts.

Published: October 29, 1989